Conservative students push 'academic freedom' issue
December 26, 2004
BY JUSTIN POPE
Traditionally, clashes over academic freedom have pitted politicians or administrators against instructors who wanted to express their opinions and teach as they saw fit. But increasingly, it is students who are invoking academic freedom, claiming biased professors are violating their right to a classroom free from indoctrination.
Once, it was liberal campus activists who cited the importance of ''diversity'' in pressing for curriculum change. Now, conservatives have adopted much of the same language in calling for a greater openness to their viewpoints.
Similarly, academic freedom guidelines have traditionally been cited to protect left-leaning students from punishment for disagreeing with teachers about such issues as American neutrality before World War II and U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Now, those same guidelines are being invoked by conservative students who support the war in Iraq.
To many professors, there's a new and deeply troubling aspect to this latest chapter in the debate over academic freedom: students trying to dictate what they don't want to be taught.
''Even the most contentious or disaffected of students in the '60s or early '70s never really pressed this kind of issue,'' said Robert O'Neil, former president of the University of Virginia and now director of the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression.
Those behind the trend call it an antidote to the overwhelming liberal dominance of university faculties. But many educators, while agreeing students should never feel bullied, worry that they just want to avoid exposure to ideas that challenge their core beliefs -- an essential part of education.
Conservatives say a chill is in order.
A recent study by Santa Clara University researcher Daniel Klein estimated that among social science and humanities faculty members nationwide, Democrats outnumber Republicans by at least seven to one; in some fields it's as high as 30 to one. And in the last election, the two employers whose workers contributed the most to Sen. John Kerry's presidential campaign were the University of California system and Harvard University.
Many teachers insist personal politics don't affect teaching. But in a recent survey of students at 50 top schools by the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, a group that has argued there is too little intellectual diversity on campuses, 49 percent reported at least some professors frequently commented on politics in class even if it was outside the subject matter.
Thirty-one percent said they felt there were some courses in which they needed to agree with a professor's political or social views to get a good grade.
Leading the conservative movement is the group Students for Academic Freedom, with chapters on 135 campuses and close ties to David Horowitz, a one-time liberal campus activist turned conservative commentator. The group posts student complaints on its Web site about alleged episodes of grading bias and unbalanced, anti-American propaganda by professors -- often in classes, such as literature, in which it's off-topic.
Instructors ''need to make students aware of the spectrum of scholarly opinion,'' Horowitz said. ''You can't get a good education if you're only getting half the story.''
Conservatives claim they are discouraged from expressing their views in class, and are blackballed from graduate school slots and jobs.
''I feel like [faculty] are so disconnected from students that they do these things and they can just get away with them,'' said Kris Wampler, one of the students who sued the University of North Carolina. Now a junior, he objected when all incoming students were assigned to read a book about the Quran before they got to campus.
So far, his and other efforts are having mixed results. At UNC, the students lost their legal case, but the university no longer says ''required'' in describing the reading program for incoming students, the plaintiffs' main objection.
In the wider debate, both sides cite the guidelines on academic freedom first set out in 1915 by the American Association of University Professors.
The objecting students emphasize the portion calling on teachers to ''set forth justly . . . the divergent opinions of other investigators.'' But many teachers note the guidelines also say instructors need not ''hide [their] own opinions under a mountain of equivocal verbiage,'' and that their job is teaching students ''to think for themselves.''
Horowitz believes the AAUP and liberals in general are now the establishment and have abandoned their commitment to real diversity and student rights.
But critics say Horowitz is pushing a political agenda, not an academic one.
''It's often phrased in the language of academic freedom. That's what's so strange about it,'' said Ellen Schrecker, a Yeshiva University historian who has written about academic freedom during the McCarthy area. ''What they're saying is, 'We want people to reflect our point of view.' ''
Copyright © The Sun-Times Company